|
|
|
| Home | About CESJ | Get Involved | Just Third Way | Capital Homesteading | Justice-Based Mgt. | Library | |
|
|
![]() |
Capital Homestead VehiclesThe Community Investment Corporation |
|||||||
|
|
The Community Investment Corporation (CIC) has been designed to serve as a for-profit land planner and private sector developer geared to rational innovation and change at the community level. The CIC would plan land use and develop the land within designated urban and rural enterprise zone for industrial, commercial, agricultural, residential and public purposes. It would sell and lease the land and structures for public and private uses and impose charges for improvement and maintenance. To avoid restraints on competition the CIC would normally not own other businesses that choose to locate on CIC-developed land. The CIC would function just as the Rouse Corporation did in building the planned community of Columbia, Maryland or as the Reston Corporation did in building Reston, Virginiabut with a difference. It would turn community residents into its principal shareholders. Citizens would accumulate assets and share in the profits from development (which normally flow to outside investors) to supplement local incomes from wages, welfare and other sources. As shareholders and through their representatives on the CIC's board of directors, local citizens could also hold land planners and CIC managers accountable for local land use decisions. The CIC strategy and its institutional structure for mobilizing citizen action are easily adaptable to areas of virtually any size, such as land surrounding nodes of a mass transit system, a downtown renewal area, or an inner-city neighborhood. The CIC can even be adopted for rebuilding an entire city, metropolitan area or natural region of the country. Enterprise zones are ideal test sites for CIC demonstrations. High technology industrial and research parks also make attractive CIC candidates. While the CIC would aim at creating an environment within demonstration development areas for stimulating private sector growth and new private sector jobs and entrepreneurial opportunities, its unique emphasis is on widespread participation, particularly in the ownership and control of land, buildings and infrastructure which must be fabricated upon the community's land for expanding the local economy. Area residents would "earn" their shares in the CIC through a Community Shareholders' Participation Plan developed and approved by citizens within the development area. Companies attracted to the area would be encouraged to adopt ESOPs so that area workers could also earn shares and share profits from the companies for which they work. Without the broad-based ownership approach, low-wage workers within a development area can easily be exploited by outside investors and companies seeking to compete with low-wage companies in the developing world. This weakness can be converted into a strength and magnet for companies willing to allow their employees to link their future increases to increased productivity through frequent profit sharing, equity accumulations and dividend incomes. Lower fixed labor costs in broadly-owned local companies, particularly those applying Justice-Based ManagementSM to encourage an ownership culture, can reduce capital flight and increase job security and employee incomes, without increasing product costs. Such companies can then become America's models for global competition. One word of caution. The Community Investment Corporation (CIC) is radically different from not-for-profit Community Development Corporations (CDCs), Community Foundations, and Community Land Trusts, which do not provide direct ownership power and dividends to the citizens in the area. These tools of development launched in the "War on Poverty" of the 1960s too often produced poorly-managed enterprises whose ownership and control frequently fell into the hands of the few who politicized control over the organizations and local jobs. These approaches failed to decentralize access to economic power and profits by spreading broadly personal ownership of local enterprises. By centralizing ownership, CDCs empowered local leaders, not the people. The CIC, on the other hand, is designed to empower every citizen directly.
|
|||||||
|
How Would the CIC Work? Control over capital credit largely determines who will own and control productive assets and share in future profits. The CICby using a special type of real estate investment trust ("REIT"), a credit democratization vehicle that works similar to that of an employee stock ownership plan ("ESOP")would create new owners of undeveloped land and newly created assets, without taking existing property away from present owners. With the power to borrow funds from any private or public sector source, the CIC could purchase land for development from present owners. Publicly-owned land could be donated for development by the CIC, keeping local land in the hands of local voters. Public condemnation powers could also be used to enable local voters to acquire land for CIC development projects. 080503 |
||||||||
|
|||||
|
| Home | About CESJ | Get Involved | Just Third Way | Capital Homesteading | Justice-Based Mgt. | Library | |
|||||
|
P.O. Box 40711, Washington, D.C. 20016 - Phone: 703-243-5155, Fax: 703-243-5935 thirdway@cesj.org (e-mail) |
|||||
|